24 March 2013 - Palm Sunday – The Sunday of the Passion : Luke 19-23
Palm Sunday – The Sunday of the Passion. My first thought is that we would be better off reading and hearing chapters 19-23 of Luke as if we were hearing them for the first time so as not to be influenced by earlier impressions and years of interpretation and reinterpretation.
It would probably help to read Matthew, Mark, Luke and John
side by side. That, of course, would take the better part of a day! But at
least we might readily see how each evangelist tells a very different story. This
in turn suggests that there is no single, objective telling of this tale, but
many tellings and retellings yielding new insights and new meanings for all who
take the time to spend time with these sacred texts. If we could go back
somehow to hearing Saint Luke’s telling as if for the first time we might
notice a few things.
We might notice, for instance, that Jesus’ actual
crucifixion takes up only four words in the midst of a longer descriptive
sentence (“..there they crucified him…” Lk 23:33), whereas the motif of the
mocking of Jesus by Herod and his soldiers, Pilate’s soldiers, by the ever
present “crowd,” and even by one of the criminals hanging beside him runs
throughout virtually the entire narrative. Suggesting that Luke and other first
century believers want us to reflect on the fact that those who held political
and religious authority (which in reality was one and the same thing in
Jerusalem since the High Priests at the time were political appointments made
by Rome), those who represented the God-King Emperor Caesar, those who are
mocking are made fools of by their own words and actions since the reader and
hearer of these texts knows that the only real King that matters is in fact the
very one they are mocking: Jesus, King of Kings and Lord of Lords, the Son of
God (to use Luke’s own favorite name for Jesus).
That is, this confrontation in Jerusalem is not really about
an internal religious dispute at all, but rather is a showdown with Caesar’s
empire. And the active participants in this showdown really boil down to two:
God vs. Caesar who would be god. And the question begged by all the mocking
behavior throughout this story is this: Who do you believe is really in charge
of things? God or Caesar? (Lk 20:20-26)
Caesar, like Pharaoh before him, represents the powers of
domination built into human institutions. What Paul calls the “principalities
and powers,” those people and institutions that hold the world in bondage, and
whose functionaries have names like Pharaoh, Herod, Pilate Caesar, Hitler,
Stalin, Amin … the list is nearly endless. The list might also include
institutions such as slavery, colonialism, corporate raiding of resources,
industrial pollution, armament industries, banking and mortgage systems,
apartheid, and all institutions and systems that deprive the common good of
liberty and resources with the necessary armed backing of a militarized
government. On Palm Sunday, Jesus begins to challenge the empire so understood.
One way of reading all the mockery in this story would be,
“Whose side are you on, anyway?”
Another thing we might notice if we were hearing this for
the first time is no mention at all of any notion that Jesus had to die for our
sins. This comes as a surprise to those of us living in a culture where the
loudest Christian voices would assert that this is the Good News. As if Jesus
had to die. As if the powers that be could not possibly be moved to change and
begin to look out for and care for the whole world and all the people and
creatures therein. Jesus’ life and teachings would seem to indicate that his
Good News for the poor, the persecuted, the broken and brokenhearted is a
vision of God’s love, God’s Shalom, God’s healing and forgiveness made available
to all. As if the most basic message of the Gospel is not: “You are created by
God, You are a child of God, You are beloved by God, You are accepted by God,” but rather “You are a sinner and someone had
to die and pay for your sins before God could love you and accept you.
As if there is some limit on God’s power to forgive; namely,
God can forgive only if adequate contrition
and sacrifice is made. As if Jesus’ death on the cross was necessary – not just
the consequence of what he was doing – which was renouncing the splitting of
the world into warring camps, holy and unholy, clean and unclean, tax payer and
tax collector, men and women, Jew and Samaritan, Christians and non-Christians,
all the while renouncing the way of armed might to change the world, and
advocating a way, God’s way, of unity, the way God intends the world to be.
As if we have already forgotten the lesson of the Prodigal
Son, a story in which Jesus himself asserts that no special machinery is
necessary for forgiveness. The father is pictured as already heading out to
greet and forgive his returning Son before the son can say or do anything.
As if another act of violence is the only way to get God’s
attention. As if God’s plan for salvation, the making whole of humankind,
requires a death. Jesus did not incarnate God by dying. Jesus was executed by
Rome for carrying out God’s will, not because his being crucified was God’s
will.
Jesus’ commitment to a vision of God’s world, God’s kingdom,
God’s reign, committed him to a struggle for justice, right relationships, and
non-violent resistance to the principalities and powers. Jesus shows us how to
do justice, how to love kindness and how to walk humbly with our God. Jesus was
passionate for God and God’s way. When his disciples attempt to protect him by
the sword, actually cutting of the ear of the high priest’s slave, Jesus shouts
out, “No more of this!” No more of this. Do we hear this? Do we want to hear
this? His passion is for “No more of this” kind of armed struggle. This is his
understanding of God’s will. This passion for God is Jesus’ Passion. Jesus calls us to join him in his passion.
Perhaps we can be helped in this by noting that among the
dictionary definitions of the word “passion,” in addition to the traditional
understanding of “Christ’s sufferings in Jerusalem,” is this: “Boundless
enthusiasm.” And surely we are those people who remember that the word
enthusiasm comes from the roots en,
meaning “in,” and theos, meaning
“God,” literally meaning “inspired by God.
This narrative in Luke asserts that Jesus is boundless
enthusiasm incarnate. And that this boundless enthusiasm inevitably leads to a
life of God’s compassion, sympathetic concern for the suffering of another,
together with the inclination to give aid or support or to show mercy.
Jesus’ passion is his passion for God and God’s way, which is
a life of compassion, forgiveness and mercy for others, all others.
We do well to remember that the Roman appointed Temple Priests
in Jerusalem pictured as presenting Jesus to Pilate held a monopoly on the
forgiveness of sin through the system of Temple sacrifice, a system that
required money and goods. That is, social and economic status controlled access
to God and God’s forgiveness.
Thus, to think of Jesus as a “sacrifice for sin,” as some
new testament writers do, is an assertion by those writers that the monopoly in
Jerusalem is over. That is the death of Jesus was not God’s will, nor was it in
any sense Jesus’ vocation or mission. Jesus’ life, death and resurrection,
inseparable dimensions of who he is, are a proclamation of radical grace, mercy
and forgiveness. Is it any wonder that those in charge of the monopoly on
forgiveness wanted him dead?
Lest we feel too good about finding ourselves on his side of
this story, however, we will do well to remember that in only a few hundred
years after his life, death and resurrection, the church would claim for itself
an institutional monopoly on grace and access to God. Leaving us to wonder, can
we hear this narrative in such a new way that we can moved to make Jesus’
passion our passion?
In a world increasingly divided against itself, there are
countless souls awaiting our response to this central story of our faith that
we call The Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke. First we
must spend time with this story. We must try to hear it as if for the very
first time, setting aside all that we have been taught about it, all the
traditions that have come to surround it, contain it in an attempt to
domesticate it. Who do we believe is really in charge? God or Caesar? Whose
side are we on anyway? Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment