The Trap
Jesus tells another story, a parable, and it’s a trap. It’s
about a Pharisee and a Tax Collector in Luke 18:9-14. The Pharisee, a respected
teacher and authority on matters of Torah, gives a somewhat puffed up rundown
of how he has practiced Torah fasting and tithing beyond the commands, unlike
others “like this tax collector.” The Tax Collector, considered by many to be
collaborating with the Roman oppressors by collecting tolls and taxes for
Caesar and tacking on more for himself, on the other hand, looks up to God and
simply says, “O God, be merciful to me, a sinner.” Luke, as narrator, frames it
as being aimed at those who consider themselves righteous – in a right
relationship with God – and who therefore “despise others.” And Luke tacks on a
familiar conclusion by this time in his gospel: “…everyone who exalts himself
will be humbled, and the one who humbles himself will be exalted.” Thus, how
Luke frames the story leads one to the standard interpretation: the Tax
Collector, because of his humility, leaves “justified,” while the Pharisee, as
a result of his perceived arrogance, does not.
There are several problems with this interpretation. 1) Such
an interpretation leads to negative and quite distorted views of Judaism and
Torah, leading directly to tacit or outright anti-Semitism. Such negative views
of Judaism and Temple ritual stands against both the teachings of Jesus and the
witness of his followers who, long after his death and resurrection, Luke tells
us in his second volume, The Acts of the Apostles, “day by day” continue to
worship in the Temple together. 2) The parables of Jesus are meant to shock,
surprise and make us think in new and different ways, which the standard
interpretation does not do. The standard zero-sum solution, one must be
justified and one is not, in the end is limits Divine Grace and Generosity, and
leads us to practice the kind of elitist chauvinism this caricature of a
Pharisee suggests. We are happy to be “saved” ourselves; we are less happy when
those we dislike or look down on are also saved, especially if they are
“sinners.” 3) And of course, all of us are sinners. There is that.
The standard interpretation suffers from several
misconceptions of the world Jesus lives in regarding the place of the Temple in
Judaism, the place of faithful practice of prayer and Torah in a communitarian
culture, and as usual, an English translation issue. If it is at all shocking
that the Tax Collector, a self-confessed sinner, is justified, a deeper
understanding of the world in which this parable lives can lead to an even more
shocking conclusion!
Worshipping in the Jerusalem Temple was not limited to male
descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel. Quite the contrary, people from
all over the ancient world, female and male, were welcome as the Temple had a
place for everyone to stand: the Holy of Holies for the Ark of the Covenant,
the Sacrificing Altar for the Priests, a court for Jewish men, a court for
Jewish women, and an outer court for everyone else, i.e. Gentiles. Life in the Temple,
and throughout the land of Israel, was communitarian. Jewish prayers speak to
“Our Father…Give us…Forgive us….”. Praying in the plural recognizes that each
member of the community is responsible for every other. The Temple is where we
come to remember this and make things right.
That is, the negative practices, sins, of one person can
negatively impact everyone else, just as the good deeds of one person can
positively impact the whole community. Similarly, the Temple sacrifices were
offered for the well-being of the whole community. In the story before us, it
is likely that first-century Jews understood that the Tax Collector with his
prayer of atonement might tap into the merits and practices of the Pharisee, especially
since he stands in the very place where atonement can be attained: the Temple.
Just as one person’s actions can bring calamity upon the community, so can the
merited behavior of one person save the whole community. It is just such an
understanding that leads Christians to believe that Jesus’s actions and faithfulness
allows others to be justified.
Then there is the problem with verse 14a, most often
translated, “I tell you, this man [the Tax Collector] went down to his house
justified rather than the other.” Yet, it can also be rendered, “To you, I say,
descending to his house, this one is justified alongside that one.” The Greek
word in question is para, from which we get such words as ‘parallel,’
‘paradox,’ and ‘parable.’ It can mean “rather than,” but just as often it
means, “alongside of,” or “because of.” To judge one or the other as “better”
is to fall into the trap of the parable. To judge one or the other leaves us
believing that God’s mercy and forgiveness is limited – which goes against that
core Biblical teaching that “the sun shines on both the good and the bad, on
the just and unjust alike.” To dismiss them both also traps us, since few of us
are as overwhelmingly good as the Pharisee, nor as sinful as the Tax collector.
Which is why the more challenging interpretation of the
parable rests on the very generosity that allows the Tax Collector to benefit
from the collective repentance of the Temple system and the good deeds people
like the Pharisee. [Amy Jill Levine, Short Stories by Jesus, p. 211] Yet, often
this is what we want for ourselves, but don’t want others to have. Yet, deep
down inside we know this does not sound like a consequence Jesus wants to teach
us. Jesus teaches and practices the wideness of God’s mercy. God’s love,
forgiveness and mercy are limitless and available to all. There’s enough for
everyone. It is not a zero-sum, either-or world that Jesus practices.
Amy Jill Levine likens this all to a
middle-school-group-project. One person may have the wisdom, one artistic
talent, one can provide the snacks, and one appears to contribute nothing. Yet,
if the project gets an A, all four benefit, even the one who did nothing. “This
may seem unfair, but what if it is because the other three of us dismiss him as
lazy or stupid. The other three may signal disappointment at his being assigned
to our group. He may have felt unworthy in our presence. Yet, he trusted us and
the system. Had the rest of us been more generous with him rather than
resentful, we would have learned more as well. And what if he didn’t care at
all? What if he depended on us, even though we were fools for doing his work
for him? What we do is still worthwhile. We can afford to be generous. There
are other systems of justice (e.g. test grades, a final judgment) in which his
contributions or sins well be assessed.” [ibid p 211- 212]
In the end, like all parables, the story is left unresolved.
Does the Pharisee praise God, or praise and only care for himself? Does the Tax
Collector change his job and offer restitution to those he ripped off, or must
he continue to work for Caesar’s Empire? Is only the Tax Collector justified in
the end? Or, is he justified along with and because of the extraordinary life
of the Pharisee? Do we believe we are our sister’s and brother’s keeper? Do we
choose to live in a communitarian world where we all have something to
contribute, even if what we give is the opportunity for someone else to provide
us a benefit? And if our good deeds aid someone else, rather than begrudge
them, why not celebrate and live a life in which all are justified? Will we
despise others? Or, will we work and pray on behalf of the common good for all
people?
The choices are left to us. Deep down inside we all know the
choices Jesus makes. Will we fall into the traps in this story? Or, will we
walk in the way Jesus calls us to follow? We know God’s goodness and mercy
exceeds all that we can either desire or ask for! Thanks be to God forever and
ever. Amen!