Resurrection and Transformation
In a chapter in which Jesus is tested by the Sadducees, Priests and Scribes three times while teaching in The Temple, the third test is this question about a poor widow who, after her first husband dies, marries one brother after another of his seven brothers. Each one dies. After each marriage she is left childless. [Luke 20 27-40] Which one, ask the Sadducees, will be her husband in the resurrection? Now admittedly, the whole thing sounds weird to us unless we understand that this was a thing in ancient Israel. It’s called levirate marriage. Levirate marriage was designed to help widows who otherwise would have no one to support them marry a brother of her deceased husband. Of course, it was also designed so that she could go on to have children to perpetuate the dead husband’s family line. That she would marry all seven brothers is absurd. And that all eight marriages would end up childless seems far-fetched as well, but possible. Most absurd of all is the idea that the Sadducees who do not believe in the resurrection, would ask a question about marriage in the age of the resurrection of the dead. So, what gives?
No doubt Jesus asks himself the same question. What gives?
Nevertheless, he handles the situation masterfully! First, he asserts that
people are married and given in marriage in this life, but there is no need for
marriage in the resurrection of the dead – no need for children, no need for
support, no need to extend a family line. Everyone is still dead. “Because,”
he says, “they are like angels and are children of God, being children of
the resurrection.” Angels and children do not procreate; thus, widows in
the resurrection age will have no need for a husband anymore.
Then he gets to the really substantive issue, for he knows the Sadducees are just messing with him. Remember, they do not believe in the resurrection. That’s why they are so sad, you see? But resurrection is the issue. Speaking like true Pharisee or Rabbi, he appeals to Torah, and that moment when Moses is speaking to a bush that is on fire, but is not consumed. I don’t know what is more remarkable: that the bush is not consumed? Or, the fact that it is talking directly to Moses? At any rate, Jesus asserts that it is Moses himself who finds out that the dead are raised to new life. After the bush instructs Moses to lead the people out of Egypt, Moses wants to know who the bush is? Who should I say has told me to prepare the people to leave and to tell Pharaoh to let our people go? The bush replies, “I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” Then Jesus scores the final knock out: “Now he is God not of the dead but of the living, for to him all of them are alive.” And that is why we Pharisees, he seems to say, believe there is a resurrection of the dead! Point, Set, and Match! Unless you want to challenge Moses. In which case, sure, go ahead!
That he has survived this third round of testing is evidenced by the conclusion of the story, which the lectionary, for some reason leaves out: “Then some of the scribes answered, ‘Teacher, you have spoken well.’ For they no longer dared to ask him another question.” Touche! Thus, proving once and for all that Jesus is a shrewdie!
What are we to make of all this? Luke, writing after the
destruction of the Temple by the Romans in the year 70 CE, places this just
before the final conflict with the Priests, who are aligned with Pilate, who is
the appointed authority of Caeser, Emperor of the Empire, and styles himself as
a rival God to Yahweh, the God of Israel. Nevertheless, the Sadducees, Scribes,
and Pharisees, I believe, sincerely wanted to know if Jesus really was The One
sent by God to turn their world right-side-up again. Such testing is part of
the culture. When I considered converting to Judaism, Rabbi Stanley Kessler
made clear that it was customary for him to test my intention three times
before beginning a process of conversion. Something similar was going on with
Jesus among the various sub-sects of Israel, some sincerely hoping he might be
The One, the New Moses, to lead them back to a life of freedom from the brutal
authoritarian dictatorship of Rome.
Then there is the primary issue. If the end of the gospel story is to make any sense at all, a case must be made that there is, in fact, a resurrection of the dead. Jesus offers such an argument from Torah, which was the respected group of texts for all the groups testing him. Some of the Sadducees and the Priests, however, were conflicted, since they were effectively on Rome’s payroll and therefore granted some degree of power and freedom. We humans often allow ourselves to be morally compromised to maintain whatever power and freedom we may have been given. This was true for those who collaborated with the Empire.
Then there are questions about the resurrection. There’s a
story that goes something like this: A man on his death-bed, nearing the end of
this life, calls his priest to come. “I have listened to everything you have
said for years, and I know that you have said that we can’t take it with us
when we die. But I really do want to take my vast wealth with me. What can I
do?” The priest suggests, “Why not convert your wealth to gold bricks, put them
in a suitcase under your bed and see what happens.” The man does this, Sure
enough, when he dies, he finds himself, suitcase in hand, facing St. Peter at
Heaven’s Gate. “Wow!” he says, “It worked!” He walks over to St. Peter who is
looking at him with a puzzled look on his face. “What do you have in the
suitcase?” asks Peter. The man opens it up, and proudly displays all of his
gold. But Peter looks on with even greater puzzlement on his face? “What’s the
matter?” asks the man. “Well,” says Peter, “we’ve never had anyone show up with
a suitcase filled with pavement before!”
This reflects Jesus’s initial argument that resurrection life will likely not to be at all as we experience life in this age, in our earthly life. All expectations that the life after this life will be familiar ought to be suspended. The question about the eight-time married widow is absurd and irrelevant. In resurrection there will be a radical discontinuity with life in this age. The one reliable continuity, however, is God – the One who transcends death. As New Testament Scholar Charles B. Cousar concludes, “Jesus’ point is simply that God’s future cannot be understood as an extension of our present existence. It is not the case that we can take what we like out of our current life, raise it to the nth power, and call it heaven. Resurrection entails transformation.”
As we say in our Burial Office, “life is changed, not ended; and when our mortal body lies in death, there is prepared for a dwelling place eternal n the heavens.” (BCP 382) Scribes, Pharisees, Priests and Sadducees all try to test Jesus to see if he truly is the Son of God. They try to pin him down on when the Day of the Lord will come and what life in the age of the resurrection of the dead will be like. Jesus steadfastly responds that only God knows, only his Father, and our heavenly Father, knows any of this and all of this. The one thing we can rely upon, the one continuity in the age to come, is that which is expressed by the prophet Haggai to a people who return from exile to find Jerusalem and the Temple an utter shamble. It is not like they remembered. The Lord God says to them, and to us, “I am with you…my Spirit abides among you. Do not fear!”
That fourteenth century female mystic, Julian of Norwich, sums
it up this way, “All shall be well, all shall be well, all manner of thing
shall be well.” Resurrection entails transformation. God is with us; God’s
Spirit abides among us. Fear not. All shall be well! It may not be the same, it
may not be familiar, but if we let ourselves live into the transformation God
has in mind, then all shall be well, for God’s Spirit does abide among us. Now,
and forever. Amen.